Handout argument for the Resurrection of Jesus

Here is a pdf that has a three-page argument for the resurrection of Jesus that is condensed and can be used as a resource to share with others.

Comments

Post a Comment

I regret to say that comments have to be turned off. I encourage everyone to use this blogs resources in constructive, thoughtful discussion and research.

Popular posts from this blog

Are the Acts of the Apostles Accurate? Part 1

How I learned about the reliability of the book of Acts  (Or, the reliability of my sources) I don't really remember exactly when and in what order I came across the books that pointed me to my main sources for defending the fifth book of the New Testament, but of course purchased them after getting them from the library.  What first caught my eye the most was in I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist by Christian apologists Frank Turek and the late Norman L. Geisler(1). In it they documented 84 historically confirmed facts from Colin J. Hemer's The Book of Acts in the Setting of Hellenistic History . Also, they cited William M. Ramsay's St. Paul the Traveler and Roman Citizen . As probability would have it, what really inspired me to get Hemer's book was something Geisler said to Lee Strobel in The Case for Faith . "The noted Roman historian Colin J. Hemer, in  The Book of Acts in the Setting of Hellenistic History , shows how archaeology has confirmed not...
Read more

Textual Criticism: The Two Made-Up Stories

Bart Ehrman exposed two actual passages that aren't original at all. They are the so-called ending of Mark, and the story of the woman caught in adultery (usually placed as John 7:53-8:11). The fact of the matter is that, at any rate, obviously God did not leave enough evidence to show us if He inspired the passage. And I am firmly convinced we can prove they weren't inspired at all. The forgery in Mark The first verse, after 16:8, parallels Matthew's account, and more significantly John's first resurrection appearance account. Mary might have seen Jesus by herself before the other women. She did indeed go and tell others, specifically the Disciples, and Luke specifically says in 24:11 that they didn't believe the women. Luke 8:2 says Mary Magdalene formerly had seven demons. The next two verses contain errors along with truths. Jesus never appeared in a different "form." I remember reading a book where someone said Jehovah's Witnesses once used it to ...
Read more

Is John the Baptist a Counterexample because He was a Killed Messiah?

In my first college history class, which went up to about A.D. 350, my professor mentioned to me that there was a group back in Jesus's time who followed John the Baptist as a messiah, although he had been beheaded. I eventually realized I should ask, does this refute the core claim that no one would have invented Jesus and followed Him without proof? For starters, John surely was killed. Josephus himself says Herod "slew him," which isn't as specific as when the Gospels say he was beheaded. So this wasn't invented.  This isn't a counterexample, though. It's just one other occurrence that is strange. It is way too little evidence that is to be defined in light of the historical background. Therefore, John the Baptist surely was killed. I readily admit phenomena's happen. I don't really know what's going on with them, but I know they are false, because of the evidence for Jesus beyond just proclaimed after dead. The rapid spread of Christianity ...
Read more