ANNOUNCEMENT! Please read. Thanks :)

I am all worn out.

Publishing one blog post every two days, jumping from subject to subject, has drained me of both my knowledge and my motive. Back in "About this Blog," I called it a reasonable goal to publish one post every Monday. But if you haven't noticed, there is a time gap of over a month in my writings starting February 2nd, of 48 days. The reason being? I realized, with school plus life, I didn't have as much time to think about these other really important issues and break them down in an argument.

But thankfully, I got a two weeks break from school, which has become really like five weeks because of this COVID-19 business (look to God, world, this life is not the end). So I made up for all my lost time with 8 posts in 15 days. Granted, one was basically just quickly explaining a link to a school project, but still seven is a lot in that amount of time, at least for me.

Now my plan is to take a break. I needed to share my Christian thoughts with the world, and have successfully drained myself. I will be filling my time normally spent in front of the computer with new books and new information, in order for me to to write new arguments later. Maybe I will return to 1 blog post a week, but there is no way for me to tell.

But I will be checking my email every now and then. Feel free to ask any question you wish (just as long as it is respectful), and I will try to get back to you.

Thanks for reading. Bye.

Comments

Post a Comment

I regret to say that comments have to be turned off. I encourage everyone to use this blogs resources in constructive, thoughtful discussion and research.

Popular posts from this blog

About 8 Minute Read: In the Midst of the Coronavirus -- Hope

"We each need to make sense of coronavirus in three different ways: intellectually, emotionally and spiritually. All are important—and together they present a formidable challenge to anyone." Mathematician and apologist John C. Lennox sincerely believes this, and I agree. Thus, it makes sense that an apologist is someone who doesn't fit the typical description of a religious person -- they argue for their belief system on an objective, rational level.  It would take me a while to get my hands on a physical copy of Lennox's book " Where is GOD in a Coronavirus World? " but fortunately, the kind hearts (and minds!) at RZIM have published a free excerpt.  I don't keep up with the news, and information I get about issues of the large world around me usually comes from my family. I do know that tens of thousands of people, at least, have already perished from this dreary phenomena. So it's very serious -- we are in the midst of unmistakable evil.   Or are...
Read more

"The True Lost Gospel of Peter" Updated and Expanded -- Part 2: Embarrassing Testimony

If you looked at my last post, so far we're just passed the tip of the iceberg. I don't know if you found it convincing (I certainly do), but here we get into the major pieces of evidence that I explained in my introduction for this Blog Project. Prominent Christian apologist J.P. Moreland cited two colleagues, Paul Rhodes Eddy and Gregory A. Boyd, from whom most of my argument finds its source (if you wish, see the primitive post about Mark and Peter ). Moreland was explaining "The inclusion of self-damaging or embarrassing details," and tells us, "There are answers to these cases, but that is not the point. That these are even present significantly increases the credibility of the Gospels." (1) Let there be no mistake: this isn't an attack on the character of Jesus. Actually, following all the evidence to its conclusion would practically necessitate reasonable, Christian explanations. If that sounds self-defeating, you've skillfully used critical ...
Read more

My Case Against the True Lost Gospel of Peter (and refutations)

Because of reading Peter, Paul, and Mary Magdalene by Bart Ehrman, and using other knowledge (theology theory and specific considerations for purported evidence), I have come to be able to create what is to me a thorough and powerful case against the internal evidence for the book of Mark being the true Gospel of Peter. But, as suggested in the title, and if you already know about me, it is safe to assume I haven't abandoned belief that there is strong evidence in the Gospel of Mark to prove it as eyewitness material.  If you have read my 6 part blog project titled "The True Lost Gospel of Peter," you've already come across why I believe the miracles in the book of Mark (the conclusion contains the five other links), although the material dealt with here was first recorded in what I call " my primitive post ." Don't bother looking at it now: everything is dealt with here, where we can be more confident of my conclusion because of the cross-examination....
Read more